motivation

Don’t Jump Into This Blindly

Posted on by Brenda Poulos
The current image has no alternative text. The file name is: pexels-photo-30605307.jpeg

An internet search will tell you that thousands of retirees aspire to be authors, with the goal of writing the next best seller.

But, did you know that less than 2% actually go down that road?

Before embarking on any new career, and especially that of writing, it’s important not to jump into it blindly.

Here are some things to consider:

Can you give it your all? Have you interviewed writers—or at least read about them—to find out if the life of a writer is really what you envisioned?

Then answer this question:

What will motivate you enough to get started? Money? Fame? The fun of creating a “story”?

And this one:

Are you able to set aside a block of time each day to write? Realistically, will you follow through?

And finally:

Will you allocate a portion of your finances to go to conferences, purchase books on writing, publishing/marketing, and so on? An internet search on the cost of these can be daunting, but it will help you immensely in the decision process.

Hopefully, I haven’t burst your bubble. If you’re still interested in writing, visit my website at www.brendapoulosauthor.com 

Confessions of a Hybrid

Posted on by Brenda Poulos

A “pantser” is a person who writes by the seat of their pants. He writes with little to no advance planning of plot, characters, and so on. A “planner” does just the opposite. He/she plans out the plot, the scenes, the character arc—all of it—in advance. 

I suppose you could call me  a “hybrid.” I have a definite beginning and ending in mind for my books. I even have a rough idea of how I am going to get there. However, as my characters develop, I really do listen to them. If they can argue a good case for any given action, I can be swayed.

I am always willing to use the delete key any time they bring a better idea forward.

Case in point: In Runaways: The Long Journey Home, Charlie and Claire convinced me to allow them to remain at the “Summer House” longer than I had anticipated. They had valid reasons why this would be essential to the plot.

I caved. They stayed.

In Will’s Last Testament, I allowed Will to remain healthy longer than I originally had written because he defended his reasoning so well. The resulting timeline is much more satisfying.

I also listen to my critique partner and writing group. If they say they are confused by a scene or they don’t understand a character’s motivation, for instance, I reread my submission to myself and usually decide they are absolutely right. They are my “voices of reason” when I get so caught up in the story and so close to the characters that I cannot be impartial.

I’m a self-professed hybrid: a “plantser.” How about you?