
That’s a good question.
From my perspective the answer is: yes—and no.
Critique groups are invaluable. They travel along the writing journey with you. They encourage, proofread, help with story, characterization, and so on.
When your book is completed, they give advice on titles, covers, marketing, and more.
Your manuscript should look clean and polished, so that you may be tempted to save time—and money—by circumventing the editing process and going forward with gusto toward publishing.
This may be a mistake because nothing is so helpful at this point as a “fresh pair of eyes.”
This is especially true in the area of “content” and story flow— delving into whether or not the story makes sense, doesn’t have parts that are contradictory, important points omitted.
Your critique group reads small chunks of your writing as you go along, but an editor reads from beginning to end, offering a totally new perspective. A good editor will map out the entire story and look for unintentional mistakes in areas your critique group just cannot see.
I’m convinced I shouldn’t bypass the editing process.
What about you? I love to hear your take on this subject.




